What Amsterdam has to do with Frankfurt
The stories contained herein are works of fiction. Although real events, places, or historical contexts may be depicted, all characters are entirely fictional. The portrayal of historical or possible future events serves solely a narrative purpose and is not intended to relativize, justify, or trivialize crime, injustice, or violence. Any resemblance to real persons—living or deceased—is purely coincidental and unintentional.
The Past
“When Wilhelm Friedrich Georg Ludwig of Orange-Nassau, known as Willem II, King of the Netherlands, introduced a nationwide population register in 1849, it was considered a step forward in modern administration. In Amsterdam, the system was implemented with particular rigor. Recorded were names, dates of birth, places of residence, occupations, marital status—and religious affiliation. The data enabled planning, taxation, and social organization. The city grew, became prosperous, and orderly. Order became a promise of stability.
In this Amsterdam lived the Jewish Cohen family, near the Jordaan. Their daily life differed little from that of their neighbors. Their son David played in the street while his parents believed in a secure future. The family was registered like everyone else—accurately, completely, officially on file.
May 1940. Without warning, the Wehrmacht struck. German paratroopers rained from the sky, tanks rolled across the borders. The Dutch resisted bravely—blood was shed at the Grebbe Line. But against the Wehrmacht’s superiority they stood no chance. German aircraft mercilessly bombed Rotterdam. The city center lay in ruins, around 800 dead, 24,000 houses destroyed. A firestorm that forced the city to its knees. After the threat to bomb Utrecht as well, the Dutch generals capitulated. Queen Wilhelmina fled with the government to exile in London. The Cohen family and little David stayed behind.
The occupying power quickly recognized the value of the existing registers. Recording religion enabled rapid identification of Jewish citizens. Deportations began—organized and efficient—supported by an existing administrative infrastructure. In March 1943, the Dutch resistance attempted to destroy this infrastructure. In vain. The courageous attack could not help the Cohen family. Only parts of Amsterdam’s population register were destroyed; most of the data remained intact.
Shortly thereafter, uniformed men knocked on the Cohens’ door. David, eight years old, was taken away together with his parents. He had to leave his toys behind; his laughter vanished forever from the streets of Amsterdam. His name, however, remained in the files that were meant to make life better, but ultimately sealed his fate.”
“Those who cannot learn from the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them.” ~ George Santayana“Those who cannot learn from the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them.” ~ George Santayana
The Present
On January 1, 2026, DAC8, the eighth amendment to the EU Directive on Administrative Cooperation in the field of taxation (Directive on Administrative Cooperation, officially Directive (EU) 2023/2226), will enter into force. The directive was adopted by the Council of the European Union, a body that is not directly elected by the EU population. For the first time, it obliges crypto exchanges, wallet providers, and platforms to collect tax-relevant customer data and transmit it to tax authorities. Data collection begins in 2026; the first report to national tax offices must be submitted by no later than the end of 2027—after the close of the first reporting year. The aim of the directive is to make tax evasion in the crypto sector more difficult and to create equal competitive conditions between honest and dishonest taxpayers. For compliant investors, little changes materially, but tax authorities will, for the first time, receive an automated overview of digital assets.The Present
On January 1, 2026, DAC8, the eighth amendment to the EU Directive on Administrative Cooperation in the field of taxation (Directive on Administrative Cooperation, officially Directive (EU) 2023/2226), will enter into force. The directive was adopted by the Council of the European Union, a body that is not directly elected by the EU population. For the first time, it obliges crypto exchanges, wallet providers, and platforms to collect tax-relevant customer data and transmit it to tax authorities. Data collection begins in 2026; the first report to national tax offices must be submitted by no later than the end of 2027—after the close of the first reporting year. The aim of the directive is to make tax evasion in the crypto sector more difficult and to create equal competitive conditions between honest and dishonest taxpayers. For compliant investors, little changes materially, but tax authorities will, for the first time, receive an automated overview of digital assets.
Actual Consequences of DAC8
The official position of the EU and national governments emphasizes fairness, combating tax evasion, and higher state revenues. But what does this mean for an ordinary, honest citizen—such as a family father or a single mother who saves a small amount of Bitcoin?
Short-term, real effects:
- End of financial privacy in crypto: From 2026 onward, centralized exchanges (such as Binance, Coinbase, Kraken), brokers, and even some wallet providers will automatically report every transaction to the tax authorities—including purchases, sales, swaps, transfers, and balances. This also applies to foreign platforms as long as they serve EU customers. Names, addresses, tax IDs, and detailed financial movements will end up with the authorities and be exchanged across the EU.
- For honest taxpayers: No higher tax burden (tax rates remain the same), but more bureaucracy. Taxpayers will have to provide less documentation themselves since the tax office already has the data—but errors in reporting (e.g., incorrect attribution) can lead to inquiries or audits. Increased stress if many past years suddenly become easier to review.
- Data volume and risks: Critics see massive data protection issues. Sensitive financial data is collected centrally, making it an attractive target for hackers. There are also concerns that authorities could use the data for purposes beyond taxation (e.g., freezing assets across borders in cases of suspected money laundering).
Long-term, possible effects:
- In the event of a change of government, laws could be amended to expand access.
- The data is stored decentrally by national authorities but is automatically exchangeable—one country’s regime could exert pressure on others.
- Experts on digital surveillance warn precisely about this: infrastructures built democratically for “good purposes” (such as tax fairness) later facilitate authoritarian abuse. They enable profiling, asset confiscation, or the persecution of “undesirable” individuals (e.g., opposition figures who use crypto for donations).
Databases and infrastructures like those created under DAC8 outlast governments. Historically, totalitarian regimes have often misused existing systems: in Nazi Germany, census data was used for persecution; in modern authoritarian states such as China, financial and surveillance data is used for social credit systems and the tracking of dissidents.
“Anything that can go wrong will go wrong.” ~ Murphy’s LawActual Consequences of
The Future
Let us look together into a future we do not wish for, but one that could become possible with DAC8 and a totalitarian regime.
“New Year’s Eve 2039. Over the past two decades, the European Union has changed gradually. Piece by piece. A development against which critical voices repeatedly warned. These voices have gradually fallen silent— not least due to the Digital Services Act and ‘lawfare’ deliberately used against critics. DAC8, introduced 14 years earlier and expanded over many years, has continuously tightened the rules: more transparency, more security, more central control.
Karsten Thalmann, a civil servant from Frankfurt, sits in his apartment with his wife Myriam and their children Leah and Jonah. An ordinary evening. They have always paid their taxes correctly. Years ago, Karsten inherited Bitcoin from his parents and duly paid inheritance tax on it. Every transaction is recorded, every movement documented. DAC8 stores it in an EU-wide database. Over time, this database is expanded, linked, and condensed: banks, passports, digital ID, social scores.
Bitcoin has delivered what Bitcoiners already predicted in 2026—despite, or precisely because of, the developments at the time. What investors hoped for and governments feared has become reality. The consequence for EU citizens is clear: anyone who now owns Bitcoin is in the crosshairs. Despite taxation of unrealized gains, despite tax compliance. Bitcoin awakens desires. From all sides.
Autumn 2046. Cyber terrorists gain access to the DAC8 databases. The data spreads further, is copied, sold. It ends up in the hands of criminals. Bitcoin holders are blackmailed, threatened, kidnapped, killed. The protection offered by the EU remains symbolic. The media focus on preventing these crimes from becoming public.
Anyone who has ever owned crypto is now considered a risk for capital flight. Anyone who has Bitcoin wants to leave. The Thalmanns also want to emigrate, but the application is denied. Reason: historical crypto transactions.”
Conclusion
What DAC8 will really bring, whether one should ever have agreed to KYC at all, what one should do at the latest now, what one can still do at all—these questions will fuel many interesting conversations among Bitcoiners. At the end of the day, everyone will be responsible for themselves.
“The question is not what we are allowed to do, but what we allow to be done to us.” ~ Nena
Write a comment